disolitude said:
Why is it a bad reason? I'm not a PS3 owner... and for every Killzone that I can't play on the PS3 there is a Halo, Call of Duty, F3AR, Crysis 2, Homefront, Medal of Honor...etc...that I can play on PC or 360. However a Killzone 3 game which is optimized in 3D is something cool and new that could persuade me to spend 300 bucks on a console considering that I have a 3D TV, 3D monitor and am intersted in 3D very much. However Sony decided to play hardball and not support the 3D format of my 3D TV or 3D monitor with PS3. Panasonic bluray players support it...so there really is no reason why sony can't do the same with the PS3. Its another perfect example of Sony not understanding the market they are diving in to head first. There are 6 million 3D TVs sold worldwide before 2010 which are not supported by PS3. All of these TV's can work with the PS3 technichnically...and infact do work if you purchase an adapter for some. (Mitsubishi made adapter) As of July 2010, thare are 300,000 3D TVs sold which PS3 works with. 6,000,000 users PS3 is not compatible with vs 300,000 users which it works with...well played Sony! I will bet you money that 360 version of Crysis 2 will be 3D compatible with my TV while PS3 version will require the manditory HDMI 1.4 handshake...and it will be the exact same game experience. |
didn't know you didn't have a PS3
and PS3 crysis is supposed to be better then the 360 as crytek has said their are trying to get more out of it and even the PS3's 3D capabilities for highers res could help
i thought more than 300k 3DTV'S had been sold and many reported it more than that
anyways about SONY barring old 3DTV's,most of the gaming public doesn't 3dtv and and even who oen and minor and as most 3D PS3 consumers will buy a new 3DTV,there was no need to work more on bringing it to HDMI 1.3by sony perspective







