| damndl0ser said: Thread title " AMAZING Halo Reach Beta video montage!!!!!"
raygun said: "Not impressed. How does this compare to 3 year old UT3? Or even War Hawk I played Halo on the PC and wasn't impressed either. Why is it so popular? Is it because it's name is easy to spell, or the game is easier to play? (ah-ha!! " Tell me what that has to do with a montage? It was set up to bash and or derail the thread, which it has done a good enough job of doing. If the guy wanted to talk about the montage all he would have had to say was something like. Why he didn't like it or what he thought was wrong with it. Then we could have had something to discuss. Yet the only thing he wanted to do was make fun of it. And ask why it is popular.... And you still defend. Good for you I guess. Maybe I should go piss on a few PS3 threads just because.... Sadly that would suck about as much as this does and I have just a little self control, so I don't. |
"I was trying to state that I didn't see anything new or different in the reach clips, sure if you compare Reach to halo 3, the maps are bigger, and it does look better.
BUT, bigger maps is nothing new, UT3 maps are huge, as well as Warhawk, and that's just 2 of the many others that look better, and have bigger maps. So why is Halo so popular?
Sorry if I ruffled your feathers, don't be so sensitive! I may be biased, i've played the UT franchise for years, but it seems to me that Ut has much more depth and diversity, with huge maps since the first UT, as well as smaller, tight fast maps.
So when I hear someone fussing over the fact that Reach has big maps, I say....so? Of course I may be missing the reason for the op, just some Halo fans wanting to tell each other how great Halo is, not wanting any feedback. UT3 has been out for years, try it!
p.s. i'm not anti-360, just anti Halo hype, I have played Halo on pc."
Extra spacing added by me, since that's some chunk of text.
