Solid_Snake4RD said:
disolitude said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Kynes said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Kynes said:
snfr said:
Aren't we already used to lazy developers?...
Let's wait for the launch version to judge the differences. Even if the PS3 version is heavily inferior I wouldn't care because I'm not interested in the game anyway.
|
Why when PS3 has the better version is due to a powerful console, and when X360 has the better version is due to lazy developers?
|
so why do you think PS3 versions are lower quality????????????????
it surely isn't an inferior system
|
It's an inferior system in money/time limited scenarios. PS3 has a higher theorical limit, but you need more time (which equals money) to extract it's power, so It's natural that PS3 version is more times than not the inferior version. I'm sure 99% of the people here drives faster in a world rally car than in a F1, due to the time needed to learn to drive an F1 car, which is a very hard car to learn to drive.
PS: And I'm not comparing the power of both consoles to the top speed of both types of cars, I'm talking more of developing learning curve than absolute power.
|
that fine but if they start to develop on the higher system then they can do the same in that cost
uncharted 2 just cost $20m so this shouldn't be a problem
|
20 million dedicated to a single platform /= 20 million cross platform developemnt.
I bet Mafia already cost more than 20 mil to develop for all 3 platforms...
|
yeah but if they developed it on a single platform for $20m and then posted to 360 as porting is cheap.they would have both version better
|
20 million isn't cheap when you already have an engine to begin with. How much did cost Uncharted?