Did Guerrilla Games make profit on Killzone 2?

[Ping_ii]

Solid_Snake4RD said:

Jereel Hunter said:

It doesn't matter if it profitted - KZ3 was a tech demo, first and foremost.

it was KZ2

If the game was about making money, it would have had options like split screen - but the game was put out to show what the PS3 could do.

NOT NECESSARILY as it depends what the dev wants to do with it

and anyone who thinks the game was made for $30-$40m has not done any research into the effort that went into the game.

i think you have to do ur research.it was $40m

It was already in development well before the PS3's release, the they kept increasing the budget/team size to get it to look like the CGI demo they claimed was ingame...

not really if they really were that much into the development cycle then they must have shown demo's andwould not have been flamed as people thought it was fake

GT5 itself costs $60m with more time than KZ2 and with high paid people and a big team,noway GG is getting paid more and has bigger budget

Not only did GT5 had longer dev time it also has truck load of content implemented to it!!! who in the world actually belives KZ2 cost even romotely close to GT5?

BTW if were talking simply longer dev time = huge cost then I feel sorry for red dead, alan,starcraft as these game took their sweet time.