| Jereel Hunter said: It doesn't matter if it profitted - KZ3 was a tech demo, first and foremost. it was KZ2 If the game was about making money, it would have had options like split screen - but the game was put out to show what the PS3 could do. NOT NECESSARILY as it depends what the dev wants to do with it and anyone who thinks the game was made for $30-$40m has not done any research into the effort that went into the game. i think you have to do ur research.it was $40m It was already in development well before the PS3's release, the they kept increasing the budget/team size to get it to look like the CGI demo they claimed was ingame... not really if they really were that much into the development cycle then they must have shown demo's andwould not have been flamed as people thought it was fake GT5 itself costs $60m with more time than KZ2 and with high paid people and a big team,noway GG is getting paid more and has bigger budget |
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
