highwaystar101 said:
I've adopted the stance of "you can't prove God, but you can try to prove his interactions with the world to prove his existance". Just like scientists trying to prove the existence of some fundamental particles; they can't prove they exist directly, but they can prove they exist by the interactions they have with other particles. Like finding the scent, if you will. Many religions talk of a God(s) who interacts freely and frequently with the Earth. Gods usually are the creators of the Universe, the world and humans. Such a being may not be observable to us, but the effects he has had on would be observable to us. I'll take the classic Abrahamic story of creation, which tells us that the Earth was created by god 6000 years ago. To prove the Abrahamic god would be impossible, but one could go further towards validating that god's existence if all the evidence we found was in line with the Earth being created 6000 years ago. Unfortunately it is not. The same God had also caused a great flood which covered the Earth, an event which would still bear abundant evidence, even today. But again, the evidence for this interaction with the Earth is not abundant. |
Well I didn't say how you'd have to prove anything about god but the historical evidence is certainly lacking as you say. Which is another reason why I'm not religious.







