Smidlee said:
This is self refuting since ( by "science proved..." I assume you mean scientist) as it begs to question exactly who watching the watcher that came to that conclusion. This conclusion itself could be just a butch of chemestry. Thus even science itself is based on faith , that is man is able to examine and understand the world around him. If you try to use science to show man thoughts are a butch of chemical reactions that destroy the foundation which science is based. It's a "Barney Fife" agrument (give him a bullet and he'll shoot himself in the foot) You can also make someone happy/sad/ mad with words as well. |
Do you see no difference between chemical induced hallucinations and rational thoughts elaborated through the observation of reality?
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)







