By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Final-Fan said:


Yes, you got me on the "bad things = the riots, idiot!"

He doesn't call assuming all blacks are "actual and potential terrorists" "unfair", he calls it "maybe not entirely fair", and characterized the sentiment as "good sense". Also, you haven't explained away "professional blacks [cowing] the elites".

Also:
A lady I know recently saw a
black couple in the supermarket with a cute little girl, three years old or
so. My friend waved to the tiny child, who scowled, stuck out her tongue,
and said (somewhat tautologically): "I hate you, white honkey." And the
parents were indulgent. Is any white child taught to hate in this way? I've
never heard of it. If a white child made such a remark to a black woman,
the parents would stop it with a reprimand or a spank.
But this is normal, and in fact benign, compared to much of the
anti-white ideology in the thoroughly racist black community.

...
The cause of the riots is plain: barbarism. If the barbarians cannot
loot sufficiently through legal channels (i.e., the riots being the
welfare-state minus the middleman), they resort to illegal ones, to
terrorism.
...
The rioters said they were acting out their frustration over the
acquittal of four L.A. policemen accused of using excessive force when
arresting Rodney G. King, but in fact, they were looking for an excuse to
kill, burn, and loot.


This is not racism.  Racism is hate of a particular group of people based on their race.  This author is not saying that black people are evil because they are black.  He's saying that blacks (and not all blacks) are barbaric based upon observations of the riots and statistical evidence.  I don't agree with him in terms of how far he's gone with this idea, or in his interpretation of said statistics (you need to take other factors into account), but hell, if this were 15 years ago, and I were watching the LA riots happening on TV?  Or watching them happen down the street?