Boutros said:
HappySqurriel said:
The PS3 was a great piece of technology when it was released, but that was 4 years ago and semi-conductor technology has advanced a lot since then. Over the next year or two the PS3 is going to become similarly obsolete as the PS2 and Dreamcast were when the PS3 launched, and it will not look that impressive against even the cheapest console that can be built using modern technology.
Realistically, any component of a game (or the game as a whole) will mostly be judged as being "Poor", "Below Average", "Average", "Above Average", "Good", and "Great" which can easily be judged on a scale out of 5 (0=Poor, 1=Below Average, 2=Average, 3=Above Average, 4=Good, 5=Great).
The only thing a 100 point scale does is encourage mindless arguments over whether a game that got 97.6% is better than a game that got 97.2%; where reality dictates that both these games are probably "Great" and your personal preference matters more to which one you enjoy more than the actual quality of the product.
|
?
|
oops, cut and paste from word
