By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ArnoldRimmer said:
zgamer5 said:

you are seriously going to trust a western article.

want the real story?

isreal installed a camera on the border, but a tree was blocking it, so they came inside lebanon to chop off the tree, hezoballh was their, and they are going to shoot at them, so the army fired some shots, then an isreali tank fired killing 3 civilians, i think one isreali died, or some got injured im not sure.

I don't quite see why a western article should be less credible than an eastern article in general.

But I have to admit the version you posted seems indeed quite plausible to me.

Well, in the end the big question is: On which side was the tree really? That can't be that hard to judge, so we should know very soon.

If the tree was indeed on the lebanese side, the whole incident was Israels fault and Israel illegally invaded Lebanon. If the tree was on the Israeli side, it was the lebanese fault and Israel's reaction was justified.


well because in the article they talk to an isreali, and not to an isreali and to a lebanese, also most western articles tend to favor isreal, as the west supports them.

the tree was on the lebanese side, only reason the army shot at them was because hezzab allah were preparing to retaliate, and since it was the army which shot the size of the incident decreased. if hezzab allah shot it would have probably caused a war, but the army shot and know everything is over.

isreal and hezzab allah always provoke each other to cause a war, but most of the times its threw speeches and on tv.



Being in 3rd place never felt so good