WilliamWatts said:
You could argue that its their country by right of conquest, since they are better at sneaking in than America is at keeping/kicking them out. Theres your precedent, and that predates international law. |
None of that remotely made any sense...
I mean...
A) International Law exists now.
B) There is no precident before international laws existed on the subject... because there was literally no international law.








