TheRealMafoo said:
If I had my own country somewhere, and there were only two ways to get here. One was the way I required. Wait in a line to get on a bus, fill out some paperwork, and ride 12 hours in an un-airconditioned bus with 40 other people. The other way was to steal a car. Everyone who didn't take the bus, is a car thief. Before I even got a chance to hire them, they had to have the disposition that committing a crime for there own needs was ok. You think if I hired the equal amount of people from each pool, I would get the equal quality of employee? |
That's funny!! Great analogy....I'm glad you are not a judge or an attorney.
Have you ever seen the film (or read the book) Les Miserables? Basically, the guy is starving and steals a loaf of bread. He is locked up in jail for that...most poeple think that is unfair. US Law, State Law think is unfair. That is why there is a defense called "necessity".
Stealin a car: taking other person's property with intent to permanently deprive him/her of the property is a crime both legally and moraly. Crossing the US Border without a visa is a crime agaist US Immigration Law, but not necessarily a moral crime. The intent is not to violate the law to "hurt" the US, the intent of most people in that situation is to work in order to provide for their families and so that their children can have a better future.
Now having said that, it is still illegal thus penalties are in fact in order. But I wouldn;t called them people predisposed to committing crimes.
To entertain you analogy though...US Immigration laws are more like "Wait in line to get to the bus, but the people with money get in first, then the people with high skill second, third goes the people who promise to return to their countries in 6 months, and everyone else wait for 10 years and we'll see if we have any need for you".
"¿Por qué justo a mí tenía que tocarme ser yo?"







