strunge said:
Scruff7 said:
strunge said:
atheism is fine, the ignorance of this thread is what is astounding. if you believ in religion and God, you inherently can't find aethism valid. nothing confusing about that. thus, the issue is clearly ignorance of what religion is at the heart of this thread.
that's why aethists are so great, no matter how eloquent they can communicate, ultimately their position is based on ignorance, self righteousness and hypocrisy.
|
religion is fine, the ignorance of this thread is what is astounding. if you believe in evolution and empirical evidence for existence, you inherently can't find religion valid. nothing confusing about that. thus, the issue is clearly ignorance of what atheism is at the heart of this thread.
that's why religious fundamentalists are so great, no matter how dogmatically they argue, ultimately their position is based on ignorance, self righteousness and hypocrisy.
See what i did there?
|
yes, and it is very sad that you think you have made some logical argument against my post. religion isn't based on ignorance, self righteousness of hypocrisy, it is based on faith. Aetheists attempt to dispute the idea of depending on faith but inherently are depending on faith as well, because there is no scientific eveidence to validate their position as well. see the hypocrisy of that position? of course not, or you wouldn't have attempted that silly word shuffle.see the ignorance of that position? of course not, for the same reaosn. self righteousness? of course you don't.
How sad.
|
Its absolutely not hypocrisy. The burden of proof is on the person saying something exists. Not on the person that disregards it. They don't have to prove anything. The theist does, and its not a faith based position to dismiss something that has no evidence supporting it.
