| kowenicki said: That article is extremely weak. The guy doesnt understand basic maths for one thing... his schoolboy mistake on the 300k as an absolute in error comparisons is embarrassing. He also doesnt understand tracking, he may aswell try and discredit all sources (NPD etc) because the methodolgy is similar (but different) for all of them.
|
I dunno. Clearly his math is strong. A game the sells ~200 000 according to VGC, according to 360 discrepencies, really could have sold anywhere between -100 000 and 500 000.
I see no possible error in translating a dicrepency of 300 000 to whichever game/system.
@comments: Banned for trading porn? Too funny. If true, which I'm highly skeptical of, why even bother discerning that information. It's like trying to discredit Michael Jordan's basketball accomplishments by saying he cheated on his wife. Absurdly unneccessary.
