Euphoria14 said:
FF_Fanatic said:
Euphoria14 said:
Before anyone quotes me and asked why we don't see any of this stuff about The Fight getting bashed on I would like to inform you that I, the same person who posted a negative Kinect article is the same one who posted and explained how The Fight got hammered.
Here is the thread before anyone even wants to even try to cry out bias.
"
I found this out from their other Move article, which also praises it on precision and also kills The Fight: Light Out."
http://scrawlfx.com/2010/07/hands-on-playstation-move-games
From this thread about the precise controls of Time Crisis I went out of my way to speak out about the bad preentation and problems of The Fight, something that I am sure wouldn't be liked in a positive article about something other than that game.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=113677&page=1&str=169736280#8
|
so basically fight:lights out is just a bad game, and it's not the move which is bad thanks for confirming that to cetain people who like to mak move look bad, may i also point iout that there are aome very impressive tech demos i have posted in the official move thread that you all need to check out if you have any doubts on move's potential you should watch it to confirm how awesome it is:):)
|
Yes, it is entirely The Fight: Lights Out since every other game worked just as they said it would, and this was a live demonstration played by the journalists at ScrawlFX.
This thread isn't about Move though, I just wanted to make it clear that there is no agenda behind negative Kinect articles if and when I post them, because if I find more, I will post them. Same goes for the Move, just as I have.
As a potential consumer and member of a site that I rely on for accurate news I think more than not the people here appreciate brutally honest articles rather than sugar coated. 
|
