| Avinash_Tyagi said: No, its just that you don't see consoles suddenly coming to life because of a few games, it takes a wealth of software that PS3 just doesn't have to reach the mass market, the games mentioned as "saving the PS3" only sell to a very small group, to reach the level of PS1 and PS2 you need games that won't be on the PS3 |
I was inclined to post this yesterday, but had to post pone my reply till today:
First, When did I say that? Ironically alot of people believe here that their 'favourite' console was brought to life by a single game (system seller) among other things.
Second, the 360 didn't have a wealth of games at the beginning of its life either. The fewer games back then that came month after month untill Gears of War didnt exactly make fantastic aggresive share stealing sales either.
Third, no one is saying it will reach the height of the PS PS2 figures. Right now, alot of things are very blurry.
Youre make an extremely flawed move saying: to reach the level of PS1 and PS2 you need games that won't be on the PS3.
Thats something don't even know as of yet, we're 1 year into the PS3's life time. You have no clear vision of what the newer games that are coming for the PS3 will bring in, I dare to bet you have little knowledge about what games are being developed on the PStripple that are yet to be unveiled.
Because the PS3 doesnt have the large library the 360 doesn't mean it won't reach an equally great catalogues. But thats fine, you probably feel the 360 or Wii games appeal more to your liking.
But speaking for the general consumer market isn't smart.
Nintendo & Sony supporter:
Consoles: Wii & PS3.
