I see what your saying, but by what I understood from the law, all they will be doing is handing them over to imigration (feds). So they really aren't enforcing it per se, they are just handing them over to the feds, wich as far as I know is ok to do. If some commits a federal crime and a state crime at the same time they may be handed over to the feds. Am I right on that? If so since they can only question someone who is already violating a law is that not a similar case? You also said that imigration law has been shaped by the courts, doesn't that mean there is a possibility that this can be constitutional so long as the highest courts say so? Would that not just be a contuation of the courts shaping laws not in the constitution? Sorry for all of the questions, I just want to get this right
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
