By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kiefer23 on 26 July 2010
Edit Thread
SMC said:
Khuutra said:
SMC said:

Halo has been miles behind Killzone in graphics, technology, multiplayer and realism since KZ2.

But very few actually care about those things. To many what's more important is:

- Controls/How it plays

-  Fun

And an overwhelming amount of people think that Halo nail those two points spot on. So, my point is that bringing realism and Killzone into a Halo discussion is irrelevant, because nobody in Halo world cares.

How do you qualify Killzonoe as having better multiplayer than Halo if Halo is more fun?

I personally don't believe Halo is more fun, I despise Halo, but a hella lot of people do which was my point.

In terms of online/multiplayer I was more referring to features, such as Killzone 2's in-game (so simple yet excellent) clan system, and the way that there's basically only one known glitch on KZ2 nowadays and it's so hard to get into it's not worth the hassle.

But actually, on second thought, I guess Halo has a lot of unique features online as well, so I drop the multiplayer point. It was more my opinion that the other points.

Forge, Theatre, Custom games, character/emblem/tag customisation, Ranked and Social matches, fileshare, photomode, bungie.net linking, 4player offline/online co-op. and that's just Halo 3.

All of that much more and much better in Halo Reach.