| SMC said: Halo has been miles behind Killzone in graphics, technology, multiplayer and realism since KZ2. But very few actually care about those things. To many what's more important is: - Controls/How it plays - Fun And an overwhelming amount of people think that Halo nail those two points spot on. So, my point is that bringing realism and Killzone into a Halo discussion is irrelevant, because nobody in Halo world cares. |
Care to elaborate? I will admit I have never played KZ2 but I believe halo's continued online presence and local multiplayer may have an edge over kz2 for multiplayer. What technology? is that the same as graphics? Cause to me having split screen this generation seems to be what is hard for devs, that seems to be superior technology. What is so real about KZ2, I will admit halo is not super realistic, outside of its sci fi theme it is as realistic as most other console shooters. Or what do you mean by realistic? graphics? Physics? Style?
Your opther points I agree with.
Edit: Didn't finish reading the thread before I posted this.
