yo_john117 said:
dahuman said:
yo_john117 said:
Well I can't argue that the PC has way better deals for games and content but respect??!? That doesn't even enter into the equation.
As for games - PC doesn't have Halo Reach so thats just thats not even close to true...
Oh and the guy in the video is an immature jackass.
|
Halo Reach won't be the end game for FPS just like how Halo 3 was never the king, until a motion control proves itself 100% and they make the games go ultra fast, I'll never acknowledge console FPS as real competitive gaming, not to mention console FPS is fucking up a lot of the ones on PC, but if you are a fan of the Halo stories, then I have no objections since it's always fun to follow stories that you like. I'm happy to know they made it harder though, that's what they claim anyways.
and no, I don't suck with the dual analog =P not even close, it's just ridiculous when you play Valve games on PC vs consoles is all I'm saying, difference in control and reflex are too big.
|
Name one FPS that looks better and has even half as much content as Halo Reach.
|
I think cs 1.6 has several hundreds of times more mps than halo reach, and much tighter gameplay to boot. But it is 10 years old, and in a combination of content and looks, that has been released recently or in the near future, you are right (at least as far as I can remember). The problem is PC games are becoming more like consoles games, i.e. less and less content. As PCs get worse and worse they approach the level of consoles.