By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
yo_john117 said:
dahuman said:
yo_john117 said:

Well I can't argue that the PC has way better deals for games and content but respect??!?  That doesn't even enter into the equation.

As for games - PC doesn't have Halo Reach so thats just thats not even close to true...

Oh and the guy in the video is an immature jackass. 


Halo Reach won't be the end game for FPS just like how Halo 3 was never the king, until a motion control proves itself 100% and they make the games go ultra fast, I'll never acknowledge console FPS as real competitive gaming, not to mention console FPS is fucking up a lot of the ones on PC, but if you are a fan of the Halo stories, then I have no objections since it's always fun to follow stories that you like. I'm happy to know they made it harder though, that's what they claim anyways.

and no, I don't suck with the dual analog =P not even close, it's just ridiculous when you play Valve games on PC vs consoles is all I'm saying, difference in control and reflex are too big.

Name one FPS that looks better and has even half as much content as Halo Reach.

 

I think cs 1.6 has several hundreds of times more mps than halo reach, and much tighter gameplay to boot. But it is 10 years old, and in a combination of content and looks, that has been released recently or in the near future, you are right (at least as far as I can remember). The problem is PC games are becoming more like consoles games, i.e. less and less content. As PCs get worse and worse they approach the level of consoles.