Smidlee said:
Statis (no evolving eyes) including living fossils is also evidence of evolution. everything is evidence of evolution which is a fundamental problem. ToE tries to explain both "A" and "Not-A" at the same time. With such a big target you can't miss. In reality the fossil record does not support ToE so the evidence has to be forced to fit the theory. |
You mean stasis?
Also the reason the worm hasn't evolved further is due to a lack of environmental pressure. Worms that have better eyes do not have a higher chance of survival than worms without them so therefore the eyes do not change.
Also I'm done with this topic, you're claiming all the evidence has been shoehorned to fit everything, you clearly have no respect for science so theres no real point arguing it with you.









