Slimebeast said:
zgamer5 said:
Slimebeast said:
Armads said:
Slimebeast said:
It's because without God you can't explain reality.
From what we have observed so far in this physical world we can conclude that stuff don't come into being from nothing, so there must be an explanation outside this reality, forces beyond the observable physical world.
Then there are dozens of other reasons to believe in a God.
|
If you can't have something come from nothing then where did god come from? If you say he's always been then that answer nulifys your own argument because then the same could be said for the universe. If you say another god then the question must be asked again endlessly.
|
From what we know about our universe through observations time and time again stuff don't come out of nothing. Therefore there should be something beyond this universe, for example a god.
|
from what we know about our universe and the fact that if green land melts their will be an ice age, their are no such things as patterns and hence if we are created the universe shoudn't be created, also if god is part of your universe then he should abide by it laws, hence he must come out of something.
if god created the universe where was he when he did that? if he was in the void he would be non existent.
|
When God created the universe he was in the god-world.
|
That makes no sense, what created god? What created god-world? Even in god-world there must be rules and so something had to either have created god or god must have been eternal. But with the latter option you're stuck with the same problem as I stated before: Why believe that god has always existed in god-world and created our universe at some point rather than simply believing that our universe is eternal? It adds unnecessary complexity to the explanation and therefore is less likely to be correct. With the former option your stuck with the infinite loop of who created god/god-world and who created that god? It goes on forever
