By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Slimebeast said:
dtewi said:

Slimebeast, here's the focal point of your argument.

Your reactions to sociological behaviors (such as homosexuality) are already pre-determined according to your DNA.

You haven't provided a lick of solid evidence (not questionnaires that don't even delve into the genetics aspects), I want proof, solid, concrete PROOF that this is even REMOTELY true.

Wrong. A twin study is an extremely strong genetic aspect.

Let me lay it out for those who might not get the point of twin studies:

* Identical twins = identical genome.

* You split the twins in separate groups. Each pair of twins were separated at birth or at a very young age, and thus have been influenced by different environmental factors. 

* Any statistically significant similarities found between the groups - whatever parameter you decide to study; traits such as body length, disease, success in education, religious activity, criminal behaviour, happiness, homosexuality - can be attributed to inheritance.

* Any differences between the groups can be attributed to environmental influence.

So for this study, you got 4,000 twins that were separated at birth.

I don't buy that. For a minute.

Well of course that makes sense. But since the twins were NOT separated, you can't determine which was the root, genes or environment! That makes the whole study invalid.



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you