Scruff7 said:
NoddyHolder said:
FootballFan said:
Scruff7 said:
Cuba? Beloruss?
I wouldn't want to class North Korea as socialist though.
|
Are the above countries mentioned prospering from this political way?
Anyway, I see Labour as socialist.....my definition varies to you guys.
|
Cuba maybe, but not the same kind of Socialism as I would advocate.
your definition would be wrong then, look up Socialism on a decent site and you will see.
|
"The Labour Party is a democratic socialist party. It believes that by the strength of our common endeavour we achieve more than we achieve alone, so as to create for each of us the means to realise our true potential and for all of us a community in which power, wealth and opportunity are in the hands of the many, not the few, where the rights we enjoy reflect the duties we owe, and where we live together, freely, in a spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect."
Probably not exactly a definition of socialism, it also doesn't even mention 'socialism' at all.
|
their policies havent been anywhere close to that since the 70's...
