aragod said:
This is complete BS, some people doesn't have that necessary psychological requirements for sex in their 50s. Someone might be ready at 12, 14, someone never. You can't put an age restriction on this, especially when it's a jailbait. Thanks god for our country, where you can have sex without legal consequences since 14 years. If you were to set an age restriction by psych. req. you'd have to do that by case, which is impossible. As long as it's not forced, I don't care what the age is. Most girls at 14 years are more than capable to process "sex", you'd be surprised to know what some of them think about those restrictions. Poor americans. |
When dealing with a teenager, it's pretty hard to judge what is forced and what is not. Kids can be easily manipulated. There's lots of things we don't allow 14-year-olds to do, why should consenting to sex with an adult be an exception. Would this kid had accepted to have sex with his mother had he been 18 or 21 or 30? We don't know, but we need to go by the premise that kids can't decide some things for themselves in order ot protect them. Some kids may be able to consent to sex at 14, most however aren't.
And I know very well that 14-year-old girls are capable of processing sex. My cousin actually lost her virginity at 14 and contrary to what happens usually she's the one who pressured her boyfriend into doing it. However 2 teens havingsex with eachother isn't the same thing as a teen and an adult having sex (which is automatically sexual abuse).
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)







