Square-Enix: Trouble Fitting FFXIV On PS3

[Solid_Snake4RD]

thelifatree said:

Solid_Snake4RD said:

thelifatree said:

tingyu said:

Umm, why argue when Square-Enix only said that they need to 'optimize' the game before porting it from a platform to another platform? They cant simply copy and paste the data, is that right? Even if they are going to port it to Xbox, they still need to optimize it cause PC and consoles are different beasts. Give me one PC setup that can run Killzone 3 3D, Wipeout 3D or Uncharted 2, yeah, guess so

:) why does crysis:warhead and metro 2033 look better than anything released on ps3 or xbox 360 yet?

cause 360 has been nearly maxed

 

and devs still aren't used to developing on PS3 AS THEY ARE ON THEIR old PC architecture

Well the cell has it's advantages, but it cannot wipe away all its disadvantages. The only thing the PS3 has over PC's is possibly the cell. Which I am a fan of. But the PS3, has flaws in the design as you're finding out here. The ps3 uses an outdated modified 7800gtx chip, right after release a much much faster 8800 gtx was released for PC's with much faster then those released now.

but RSX does not take full load,it was never designed to so it being older doesn't make a valid argument point

The ram in the ps3 is just low, with 512mb. Compared to 2-4gb's in computers sold now adays. with more with enthusiast.

yes that is the case but the ram was more than enough for PS3 and is still excelling at games

Unless you're saying, that Crytek, is a much much much better developer programming wise when it comes to graphics than say, Kojima Productions or Naughty dog.

Crytek is nothing till the time they can make a good console optimized game that is know to be the best at technical things their games on PC brag about

You can make up some shortcomings because PC's are like a fruitcake and they're all different so they are not optimized. And the cell has benefits. But if you need more ram, you just need more ram.

agree