TheRealMafoo said:
Vertigo-X said:
No, it's not. Getting a large number of people to agree on something is incredibly difficult and time consuming. Nothing would get done. There's a reason the "Founding Fathers" made the US a republic and not a full democracy like you have right there. It's finding the right balance between granting freedom for the people and power for the government.
|
Not sure I follow. This is not a new idea. Today we have thousands of mayor's and county commissioner's with budgets. They would do what they do today, they would just have a much larger pot of money, and more responsibility.
|
But they aren't "linked together", so to speak, for the purposes of making decisions about the nation. They each make decisions about their own areas and not of a much larger nation. Some people think the wait for things to get done in Congress is bad, it'd be much, much worse with 10,000 people trying to come to a single decision.
Not to say it's impossible, it's just there's a more effective way.