steverhcp02 said:
ImJustBayuum said:
TRios_Zen said:
shio said:
In which case, people have been saying that he made a mistake and meant "up to", because otherwise it would mean that no game is selling at 40k, 50k, 75k, 130k, 150k, 170k, etc...
either way it means that only 30% sold more than "around" 100k. And since many developers only break even at 100k, you figure it out.
|
Wait I'm confused.
Is the argument that too much content on XBLA means developers don't have a chance, so the PSN is easier to succeed on (the implication being that there is less content on the PSN as competition)... OR is there supposed to be some kind of indication that ALL games sell well on the PSN?
From what I read in OP, it seemed like the former. But the discussions about sales percentage seem to be trying to prove a point, that frankly as we don't have PSN numbers to compare too, seems a bit myopic in scope.
|
Why is the OP ignoring this post?
|
My guess is because the person who said it isnt the OP and he probably isnt registered at VGChatz nor borwsing the forum anonymously.
but thats just a guess.....
|
the OP was heavily defending this article/opinion, so I was referring to Shio, not the person who said it. But my guess is you are not that smart to figure that out.
But thats just a guess....
