| mrstickball said: ...The fact his venom is mis-placed? He never praised the PSN market...Only attacked XBLA. He wasn't arguing from a position of strength by explaining 'PSN is better because of X, Y and Z', only that XBLA was bad because of A, B and C. |
venom?
he (probably) was asked "why not on XBLA?" and he gave his/his teams reasoning why going with PSN was the better decision - I don't know where he pulled his stats from and whether or not they are correct and it doesn't even matter, for all that matters is, that in his view they are "realistic" and that is his reason for going for PSN.
I don't know where you want to see "venom" in that.
Out of 3 possible routes he/they chose the one that seemed the least risky, because they invested 2 years and undoubtedly a lot of money to realize this project and if it failed who knows what would have happened to the guys?
