thismeintiel said:
If you want to look at it this way, then no one is disruptive. The NES only improved on things learned from the Atari gen. The SNES was really only a graphical upgrade from the NES. And so on and so on. Even the Wii was just an improvement on already existing motion controllers. I mean it seems the argument is Nintendo always changes the game (or are "disruptive), but others, regardless of what they bring to the industry, are just improving on what Nintendo did. That is just rediculous. As far as real game changers go, each company has brought us something. In the NES era, Nintendo popularized an improved D-Pad and the Start & Select buttons. During the SNES era, Nintendo popularized the shoulder buttons, as well as the four action buttons arranged in a "diamond." During the PS1 era, Sony popularized the dual analog, as well as an overall control design that many have emulated since. They also standardized disc-based media. During the PS2 era, Sony helped push DVD into the huge success it became. MS also brought about Live, showing how online gaming could be big on consoles, as well as a standard HDD in every console (something they have oddly abandoned this gen). During this gen, which I will call the Wii era, Nintendo has popularized motion controls in gaming. Sony has brought out a new media format that won't constrain developers as games get larger, with better graphics/HD textures. And MS has brought us Achievements, an added reward for further excelling in a game. These have all been game changers. |
well said








