ssj12 said:
The technology needed for TVs are anything that has screens larger then the 3DS's to present picture in 3D without glasses is very immature. Sony has two sets that DO NOT require glasses. There are two issues with it. One, the technology is VERY VERY expensive; two, 3D without glasses has a extremely limited viewing angle. The reason the 3DS doesnt need glasses is because the screens are small and the users will be staring pretty much straight at the screen at any given point. If for some reason a gamer tries to play the 3DS when the system is set down and at any angle be prepared to see a giant blur at best. Both Sony and Panasonic have TVs without 3D glasses. They are expensive and impracticle in every aspect due to limitations in technology. If Nintendo is going to release a full 3D console, they will have to require glasses or home-owners to have $20,000 TVs. Which sounds better? Nintendo isnt even pushing technology with the 3DS. They are taking technology that exists and shrinking it down to the only point that it will work till the tech matures. What Sony is saying is that Nintendo is cheering on technology that has been in use for over a year now, that is currently extremely limited, and making fun of the only way current 3D tech can work effectively. They are asking to work together so that maybe Sony and Nintendo can push "glassesless" 3DTVs into mainstream affordable levels by developing upon existing tech. |
Wow. What?
You just said exactly the same thing as the the people you're "disagreeing" with. They said Nintendo can push glasses-less 3D into the mainstream. You just gave a bunch of reasons why Sony and Panasonic can't.
And no, Sony's not trying to promote glasses-less 3D. The article clearly states that they (or at least the person interviewed) believes glasses are necessary for a good 3D experience.
"Jesus said to him, 'I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.' " ~John 14:6 (NKJV)








