O
PS_Move said:
thelifatree said:
PS_Move said:
Mummelmann said:
PS_Move; this is somethind I don't understand with developers today; everyone seems to want to make their games more causal but RPG's are silly to water down. You end up with a game that loses its depth and thus appeal to RPG gamers and a game that is still a tad to deep for the more casual gamers.
|
Yeah I agree with you there used to be a time when I looked at a game with the brand of Squaresoft on it, you did not need a review to tell you it was a good game, you knew it would be because of the pedigree and previous experience of their games such masterpieces, now as for S.E it is totally different all I see is a company who has basically sold their soul, when a company loses respect it is not a good thing for the longterm as eventually even the most devout supporters will not follow them anymore, and I gurantee you the casual users will not be there for them always, so S.E will lose out in the end
|
One question I must ask. Have you played TWEWY. I'm a staunch supporter of that game, and proponent to making it the most popular game this gen (unless something else comes out)... (And 13 supporter, though I will say the aspect I was highly dissapointed in it was the story part. and the main reason I play FF TBH is the story and the chacters so failed half there, I loved everything else, whether it's balanced etc, it was fun as hell to me.)
|
To be honest, it did not look my kind of games, so no I did not play on it, but everyone keeps on telling me to play it so....
|
I can't recommend it blindly. And there is not really any title I can compare it too, and it's not a traditional JRPG. I'm sure you've looked at it a tad. maybe :P
However, if it's not your style it's just not your style. :D
I'm bad at convincing.
However, it had that special charm of older Squaresoft games IMO. Though I did think story wise, all the direct FF sequels did too (except Advent Cheldren). Just in 2/3 the gameplay was aweful-subpar. IMO you probably have different ;P
