DarkisWR said:
I really dislike it when one's opinion/likes/dislikes about games is spouted like fact. I'll start with your AAA bit... 1) just becuase it doesn't appeal to every ''hardcore'' gamer does not make it less/not hardcore. 2) Most times ''AAA" is equated to quality. Anything else is casual talk and casual thinking. "Compare the successes of Bioshock to Halo. And IMO, Bioshock rocks while Halo sucks. What do the masses mainly go for? Halo" 1) Thats comapring apples to oranges...both are on such differnt ends of the fps spectrum that you cant comapre em. 2) Last time I checked casuals really arnt running out to pick up highly competive shooters. If you can say that about Halo then you can say that about MW1/2,WaW,Gears,KZ2,Mag. 3) Theres alot of ''Hardcore" buying games like Halo/MW etc.. 4) So far by your reasoning any game that sales like Halo is the masses aka the casual. If the majority of the ''Hardcore'' are worried about not being supported...then guess what...go buy core games.
"We don't often see unique titles like this because they are too risky in our current economical and western cultural climate. So less risks are being taken with developing these games." Disagree indeed... 1) Dev's and pub's want safe bets...not niche games with niche profits...Your forgeting...gaming indurstury is about one thing and one thing only...MONEY. 2) Cause of #1 we see less risky endeavors...even more so if they are under funded and not on a high lvl of quality. 3) Western cult climate as oppessed to what Japans? Europe's? Yeah...w/e |
I would appreciated if you would not put words into my mouth by twisting things.
I NEVER said that a game is less hardcore if it doesn't appeal to every hardcore gamers, NEVER. I do not know where you got that from. And you say "AAA" equates to quality. But the problem with this is that severyone will not always agree on the quality of some games. Moot point.
And "casuals really arnt running out to pick up highly competive shooters?????" Let's not get too narrow minded here. Can it be highly competitive with some shooters when playing online? Yes. Is that suppose to mean everyone who buys that shooter bought it to play online? Nope. There is something called a "campaign mode" which casuals buy the game for while it doesn't stop them from going online when they want to. And as I mentioned previously, "But when all you want to do is shoot and blow things up, you are either a gamer that prefers to play shooters or shooting is all you really want to/can understand. I tend to come across the later who are not gving games like Beautiful Katamari, Mass Effect, and Lost Odyssey a fair shake" usually applies to the casuals.
And I NEVER said that it wasn't smart for developers to do what they have to do to make money. If you can recall, I did say that it was a double edged sword. And it's not just about being niche. I said "...the masses are catered to more and more while that unique expereince is getting harder and harder to find." Those unique experience we find in some games aren't necessarily niche wouldn't have such a hard time justifying itself if i t weren't overshadowed by what's popular.
And yes, I did say "western cultural climate." As a general statement, most westerns are knee-jerked, superficial, short attention spanned, and looking for that instant gratification. Again, general statement. Unfortunately, this is rather characteristic of most casual gamers. Most hardcore gamers look for that deeper experience where the patience in playing that games gives greater rewards.
Step back and you'll see.
Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.