Hynad said:
You keep on missing the point over and over again. But first, here is what you said:
I already explained to you that you were wrong. I never once said that my opinion was better than yours and certainly never said you were stupid, even if you seem to obstinately try to make me say it. I illustrated that people can have different way to see this topic. Some can think a game with a more robust graphics engine, using full polygonal graphics, instead of pre-rendered backgrounds is going to look more impressive to their eyes. I never once said that REmake isn't a stunning game, nor did I ever said which game I think was the most visually stunning of them all. But you went on trying to take my examples, how I illustrated how people can view things differently, and tried to turn me into the hypocrite here. Basically trying to use mirror projection at me, since your ego can't seem to grasp the fact that it isn't alone on this big mass of dirt that is the earth. You tried to twist what I said, to make it look like I was belitteling your opinion. You just don't get the memo, no matter how clear it is addressed to you.
Clearer clear memo: The world doesn't revolve around you.
Memo Annexes: People will come at you with diverging opinions. Those opinions will be formed by criterias that may or may not be the same as yours.
Now on to the second point: "I think people have the right to think what game looks better, no matter what their criterias or experience with the series are" Notice how I don't mention anything about them not having played this or that game. What I meant there, and you could have understood it yourself if you were not so narrow minded and self-centered, is that players who grew with the series from the first game and did all of them in order of release won't have the same kind of experience as someone who came into the series much later and started with titles that made the looks of the earlier releases outdated. Someone who played the very first game in 1996 won't have had the same experience as someone who played the exact same game in 2002. For its time the first game was groundbreaking. Not so in 2002. Do you need more illustration, or can you start thinking outside the box by yourself? |
Funny how you didnt reply to it straight away just to set the record straight.. I took someones expirience to the series as what they have and what they have not played, infact that could have been taken a number of ways, why didn you not just add the part
"Someone who played the very first game in 1996 won't have had the same experience as someone who played the exact same game in 2002. For its time the first game was groundbreaking. Not so in 2002"
and not half ass explain things and leaving what you say open to take in different ways
