| Gnizmo said: Although to counter somewhat the PS3 being designed with games, you might remember the big changes that had to be done last second on the PS3. Originally it was to have 2 cells, and no GPU which ultimately proved to be far far too hard to work with and thus led to a very last second change. and why was it hard to work,cause it was new not because it had 2 cell and GPU but because the devs didn't know how to wrok with it you are again and again just saying that it should be easy but it can't it when you are bringing in new technology as people don't know it yet and have to learn it and only then can they use it. it can only be easy if they just put the existing architecture in PS3.do you really want that and will you pay big for it and will it stop piracy,no it won't do any of those and just because they wanted two CELL and no GPU,that doesn't make it not designed for games.it just makes it a new way to design games.rethink From memory the GPU is almost off the shelf PC parts which causes some problems. yes it was included to ease as people knew to work with it and the same thing you are wanting with the CPU but that couldn't be done as if CPU was same as older tech then we wouldn't have the power,the low cost and we would have piracy It kind of cuts against both of our arguments though as they did make changes to an original design for games, again they didn't chnage the original design for games but to ease the devs so that they can make games just because its a new tech doesn't mean its not for games but the original design was quite obviously not up to snuff by their own standards for game development. how wasn't it up to snuff,it was just different what do you expect them to just continue with the same old tech for ages |
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
