By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
greenmedic88 said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Cheebee said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Cheebee said:

I think the majority of people, everywhere, would prefer cheaper TV's over expensive ones, and goggles-free 3D instead of forced goggles... It's a no-brainer.


but would they want big screen movies,sports and full games on a small screen

 

no they won't

Of course you know this for a fact.

Anyway, thanks for bringing stuff into the mix that I never even remotely mentioned in the first place. XD

not for a fact but just discusiing

 

but you would like to dump a 40' screen and watch movies,,,,play games on small screen

good for you

 

no sports though and no big screen.i will take them

I think the argument here has nothing to do with whether someone claims to prefer watching 3D content on a little hand held screen or a 40" or larger display, but whether they want to pump NIntendo's current take on 3D as the solution "everyone" will want. 

Frankly, I have to say that anyone who claims they'd dump the big screen viewing experience for a pocket sized one is being disingenous at best.

Personally, I don't even like watching 2D movies on my PSP or iPhone unless that happens to be the ONLY way I can watch under current circumstances.

Frankly, you ignoring cost as a factor against size is the real disingenous thing. Cost is too high, even if the screen is larger. And going "it will go down" is not an argument, since Nintendo is offering it with their new system, at what is basically free with that system.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs