Killiana1a said:
Sharu said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
you are talking as everybody wants to watch movies on a small screen.why the hell are you even comparing it in that department?
|
No, the thing is different. When people know that the only way to see a 3D movie is glasses, they'll buy a 3D TV, earlier or later. BUT if people know that it is a possibility of watching 3D without glasses and much cheaper they'll just think - 'hey, why should i pay 5000 USD for the TV which is ALREADY outfated?' Ordinary people will not be deep in technology, they'll just compare
Watch 3D now:
5000 USD on a big TV with glasses OR 250 USD on a HANDHELD without glasses.
How'd you think what'll ORDINARY consumer prefer?
3DS will not be competing with 3dTVsets, but it will be slowing sales of 3DTVwith Glasses until glassless technology appear...
|
Even smarter and more undercutting, Nintendo before the launch of the 3DS should be holding contractual talks with Hulu, Netflix, and YouTube via Google for subscription services for the 3DS. This way purchasers of the 3DS can watch what their movies and tv shows along with the option of 3D movies because we know the 3DS will not have a blu ray or dvd player.
|
Yeah! And then the tiny screen of 400x240 will be an advantage for customers with not-so-wide internet connection... ;)
And the other thing which still frightening me is how can N keep such a strong 3rd party support with ready tech demoes in secret before E3??? I understand keeping secrets inside company - but when so much companies keeping secret together - that is something strange for this industry...
