Bad news for Sony, good News for Nintendo

[joeorc]

ninty_shareholder64 said:

It will take time.

But why should glasses-free 3DTVs not be  SD (or 480*240*2(or *4 for 2 optimal positions))?

I can imagine to buy a glasses-free SD-3DTV instead of glasses-HD-3DTV.

And the price will decrease faster for glasses-free 3DTV if  the consumer is more interested in that tech.

After all, the mass will decide which 3D tech will survive. And the 3D movies and sport channels will be available for that platform or tech.

3D Active Shutter:

One wonders why so many companies have gotten on board with such a thing. Well, it offers much more opportunity for making money, for one thing, and they don’t have to modify their screens in any way other than increasing the refresh rate, for another —saving them precious R&D money. My personal opinion is this technology will remain on top until someone’s skunk works research team produces a viable alternative in the form of circular-polarized TV display filters that don’t affect the image too much.