N-Syte on 22 December 2007
Ron Paul is certainly more principled than most. He has philosophical frame work that he is passionate and open about. He wants to educate. Many politicians could not be so bold to say aloud what they really believe. I agree with much of what he says regarding the place of government, but it bothers me that he cannot square his foreign policy beliefs against history. He tends to avoid the line of dialogue lest he say something contradictory or unpopular. How would his worldview deal with a growing fascist regime? Chamberlain them, or Churchill them? I would like to think the answer obvious, but there are always caveats with him. I guess I need to be more nuanced.
