Khuutra said:
This would be part of my reasoning, though I think you're lying in that you won't stop there; well, you already didn't stop there, but it won't stop with your last post, either. Regardless, I will reiterate my feeling that this is not an appropriate context for someone who contributes to the site to bring up his grief. It's not my place to say so in reference to policy, but as an action it undermines The Source's journalistic authority in the context of the rest of the team, which is bad. |
There is no "grief" why must you be so patronising to me Khuutra?
It's perfectly resonable to bring up, it's initiated a good debate, several mods have posted (thus agreeing the topic is fine), nobody has broken any rules (a part from one guy)
At the end of the day, I felt it needed to be brought up. I already said why I'm not going to Brett, he doesn't need to be bothered with this when he's working on 3.0. And Source ignores my comments in threads and walls. He felt he already justified why he didn't add MW2 in his article so anything I say would be meaningless.
We're not NeoGaf, the beauty of VGC is we can debate the numbers, (and thus articles) as long as we have something meaningful to back it up, I've heard Brett say this several times.
Furthermore I havn't slated the site in anyway, the article is fine, it's the title that gripes me.
