Seece said:
Well I see it differently, let's leave it at that. |
I won't, then, because you see it wrongly.
Debate, by its very nature, is a two-sided discussion in which points are presented, acknowledged, conceded, on and on, where a proposition is discussed in terms of merit. The premise of this discussion (I will allow that it is a discussion, at least) is not one of debate, though it could have been if it were something along the lines of "Should SKUs be combined when talking about best-selling games?", but the presentation of this topic precludes discussion on that point because the only valid position, according to this framing, is that yes, they should be. Thihs can't be a debate by definition.
Similarly, the discourse is not full of back-and-forth, it is a two-sided diatribe of disagreement where no progress is made and no judgment is rendered as to which side better presents its case, if cases are indeed ebing presented about anything (they aren't).
You can call it a debate in the same sense that I can call myself an elephant, but we would both be wrong.







