RolStoppable said:
There is a difference between those two statements. The first one ("I implied that...") means that Sony didn't prevent anyone from playing their systems and their games. People chose to not play them, because in their opinion those games didn't seem to be for them. But actually, I am not quite sure what you are talking about. The conclusion you drew from my post feels so... random. |
Justify it however you want because SONY did make and push games that appealed to an older audience. You have to have a target audience to have a focus to make a product have a more distinguishing feature. That's how it was done by making more "mature" games. They helped retained some older gamers while also bringing in new gamers as well. I'm an old guy and a dying breed while the younger ones have stepped up to help continue this thing called gaming. There are plenty of younger PlayStation gamers that regardless of what SONY's target audience is have bought into the console because of its games regardless of console generation. Too much blindness from illegit SONY hater here, and too much false justification. I know where you guys are coming from because I used to be a SONY hater as well.
Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.







