badgenome said:
I actually agree to an extent. I've always thought that since freedom and responsibility go hand in hand, people who aren't going to be responsible for their lives should lose their freedoms. For instance, as long as someone is on the public dole, perhaps they shouldn't be allowed to vote since they have a real financial incentive to vote for whomever is going to give them the most money and against anyone who proposes austerity measures. Or if someone is dependent on the government for their health care, they should be required to adhere to a strict diet and exercise regimen so as to minimize costs to the taxpayer. |
Of course, the costs of implementing all these nanny provisions ends up being extra large. I have had to deal with case workers and the welfare system, since being laid off, and dealing with depression. The case workers (nannies) happen to be so overtaxed, they won't have time to check on things. It is just easier to hand the cash out.
I will say this here, unless people start to act now, on a personal level to do things that are needed, then you won't get control back. These things are NOT lobbying Washington, or throwing angry tea parties, and running ads. It means to act as neighbors. The responsibility happens on a personal level, but isn't just every person for themselves. It means also acting as neighbors, and doing what is needed to help others who are down. I have seen first-hand how powerless people are in this area, and how little help you actually get from anyone. No one has a clue here. Life seems bigger than individuals on a personal level. And there is a desire to cut corners everywhere, because they have to.







