Well in regards to 3d glasses. Im not going to research and retype, but the general consensus is 3D glasses arent a deal breaker for users in theaters. Movies can egenrally account for over 50% of their sales to 3d movies....i know theres a 2-3 dollar premium which contributes, but id say the growing number of people, not declining number over th elast 2 years, shows when people see a movie in 3d, they go back in 3d, thus its not ruining the experience by wearing glasses.
Secondly, if Sony truly felt this way a much mor eimportant partnership would have been with Samsung, Panasonic, Mitsubishi, Vizio, LG......get unified glasses across all manufacturers for home theater 3D, eliminate stupid exlusive 3d bundles with manufacturers and promote 3D together in that market.
This is just sony feigning diplomacy because Nintendo is a powerhouse right now and Sony wants to tie 3D in general to Nintendo, which is awfully silly since i feel most people will already do that because of Nintendos influence. If nintendo is doing 3D, 3D is viable, glasses or not, people will be able to distinguish the difference in 3DS and 55 inch 3D needing glasses. Im confident in that.
No one is going to say "gosh i can play 3D on my 3 inch DS screen why cant i see Blu-ray on my 55 inch screen without glasses, since cinemas already tie 3D to glasses, i feel its natural consumers will tie the home theater to them as well.
This is just a sad attempt by Sony to try to sound "above it all" when in reality if they were driving markjetshare righ tnow theyd be saying something smart ass about 3DS 3D to PS3 3D being "real 3D" or some nonsense.
