By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Farmageddon said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Farmageddon said:

I'm not saying you didn't read it, but that you completelly ignored the main point of my question:

Why should their profits be discussed without counting R&D?

Look up there, you only answered to the italic part of my post. See?


their profits are not disscussed without R&D but their R&D is low so their profits are more

in my post i answered what i meant from my maint post so what i meant was if

sony profited $2b in PS2 era,they would easily put $1b in r&d and other departments profits show $1b

for nintendo,in GC era if they profited $2B they would invest around $300m so their profits show $1.7b

I know what you mean, but that was not my question. My question was why is that relevant at all, because, the way I see it, it's not.

yes it doesn't

 

but i was just saying and explaining that to many people who said NINTENDO profit even if they aren't succesfull and they will continue to be succesfull and SONY can't profit more than them