| sapphi_snake said:
|
Don't presume what I have or don't have, based upon stereotypical thinking. I put this issue in the case of parental rights, and explain WHY you get the flak. I fully understand the base biological function of sex is to extend a species and is wired to be pleasurable in the body, so that the species will continue to procreate. Beyond this are other elements needed for the raising of offspring, to create bonding between partners, so they provide guardians over the offspring so they grow up. This is beneficial to the species surviving, and having healthy future generations. And if you think this is twisted, then I am not sure what basic biology books you are reading.
In regards to sex education, there is the basics of the biological side. But human beings are more than just biological beings, and to discuss sex is to involve the entire social aspect to, and also to look to take into account what can or will happen. You do inform about STDs, and you also can inform about protection. In this, a parent can get concerned that a school isn't conveying enough the wishes of the parents the kids abstain until they are old enough to be able to be providers for childrens, and are established. Because you drag religious parents who feel that their kids need to abstain and are able to, into a system that doesn't believe this, they will impose their values on others.
