By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ArnoldRimmer said:
Joelcool7 said:


The Move is a Wiimote and nun-chuck how can you not compare it? You'd have to be blind in order to not see the obvious, the Move is WiiHD as Pachter said.

Natal is something unique and fresh it can't really be really compared to the Wii except for the fact that it breaks tradition and innovates. But the Move doesn't innovate or add anything to the table it is simply a over glorified WiiMote.

The hardware difference between The Move and the Wiimote is actually a lot bigger than the difference between Natal and the PS eye:

PS Eye = RGB camera two microphones

Natal = RGBZ camera two microphones

Wiimote = Motion sensor buttons infrared tracking sensor

The Move = Motion sensors buttons RGB camera two microphones glowing ball for tracking

 

It's true that the Move controller alone is very close to the Wiimote, but people seem to forget that this is just one half of The Move - the other half is a camera/microphones combination just like Natal has one. Natal is an advanced PS Eye, The Move is both an enhanced PS Eye and an enhanced Wiimote.

yes thank you. someone who didn't overlook the key difference between move and the Wii. the difference that makes the move the most capable of all 3 motion controls.  read this post, it is what makes the move the winner from a technical stand point. it is plain and simple the move uses the PS eye a camera that has a great many of the feature Microsoft is boasting about kinetic. it has accuracy greater than Wii motion plus because of the great glowing ball on the end. it is both Sony's rival's technologies in one.  That as well as the games is why I am getting the PS move.



correct me if I am wrong
stop me if I am bias
I love a good civilised debate (but only if we can learn something).