Well, Selnor, the media can still talk about games and be hyped about their looks, without necessarily meaning they are taking the "best graphics on console" crown. Everytime a game is potentially gonna look "more awesomest mind-blowing crazy" compared to PS3 exclusives, you always over-hype the shit out of it. As if you had an inferiority complex you need to strongly compensate for, or something (not saying you have that, per-se). And as far as I know, you always end up putting a foot in your mouth. I mean, isn't Alan Wake recent enough to remind you how that attitude of yours puts you in embarrassing troubles?
Speaking of Alan Wake. The game is absolutely gorgeous. Yet still falls short of Uncharted 2 and especially God of War 3's graphical mastery. It's still a pretty amazing looking game at the end of the day. Just like any games being currently being developed can be awesome looking games, without necessarily having to take the crown from the cream of the cream.
From my perspective, it looks like you jump into the hyping machine that these devs start. Crytek said their game is going to look better than anything on the console market so far, and you buy it without any scrutiny. That's how I see you, judging from the many threads you've done in the same manner. Could be wrong though, but that's the image I have of you (and the image many others here have of you too, I'd wager).
Now, those FPS games all look very good. But to call any of those a definite winner at this point is rather ludicrous, at least when you talk about the technical aspect of it. Anyone can prefer an art style over the other. But when it comes from a technical stand points, those games are not showing enough right now to really determine the one that achieves more. I'm not saying Crysis 2 or Rage won't look better than Killzone 3, Uncharted 2 or God of War 3. But at this point in time, it's just impossible to determine if they do achieve that.
