By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Tuganuno said:

Why do my posts always get misinterpreted? Is my english really that bad? >_>

Anyway, I was explaining to khuutra my point. If you take his post out of the conversation, it won't make any sense.

Okay so, he said (...)"If you are of the opinion that people shoud be able to hate on a company without baclash.... well, that's rather one-sided, now innit?" and what I was trying to say was: it doesn't matter that we criticize it on the internet. It won't make any difference. Did all the hate the Wii got on 2006 make any difference? Did it stop from selling millions? No, it did not. So I don't see any problems with the OP, pointing out flaws of the Nintendo 3DS and Nintendo in general. It isn't taking credit to Nintendo, he's just having a more realistic look. Or perhaps, most gamers are giving too much credit to Nintendo, and he's being more reasonable. He made the text pretty clear, so I won't even have to quote anything. Shouldn't have written "words mean nothing", that might be confusing.

And what victim card? I haven't been "attacked" or anything. I was just saying what I do in that kind of situations, I don't give a f when people don't try to see my point. In this case, some people aren't trying to understand the OP. Instead of arguing, they're just saying he's a fanboy. And that pisses me off.

I was following the convo (even if I omitted Khuutra's post for space), but it still seemed like it strayed off subject, because he was explaining how Nintendo receives its own share of criticism, which is why the whole OP is moot.

The thread isn't about the 3DS or any specific flaws, it's about how apparently nobody criticizes any of these products, and that's clearly false. Does anyone claiming this actually look inside the Nintendo forum?

"Or perhaps, most gamers are giving too much credit to Nintendo, and he's being more reasonable."

Have you considered that many people actually believe Nintendo deserves the credit they receive? When you don't actually like Nintendo's games, when you feel that the Wii is the most overrated console ever, it should be obvious why you think people are giving Nintendo too much credit. Why should that become our problem?

Some of the posts, like Rol's, are spot on. leatherhat speaks under the assumption that the games on Nintendo's systems are inferior to MS/ Sony's, so all the praise Nintendo gets confuses him. That's pretty much what the OP is about, since most of the examples he gives are either false or opinionated. If you disagree, please list some from there that are actually true, I bet they can be easily shot down.

You know, some people here feel that Sony's first party is above, or even on par / close to Nintendo's first party. That confuses the hell out of me, but you won't see me on the Sony thread devoting my time on telling everyone how brainwashed they are.


As for my last comment, I should've probably clarified, but I was referring to leatherhat. There were plenty of people that argued against his OP, but instead of responding to them he just whined about how every Nintendo fanboy on the site apparently attacked him.