amp316 said:
But they did publish it which counts for something. Now why would Nintendo want to protect sales during the Gamecube era when their sales weren't very good? Are you telling me that if you're behind; making a game that doesn't appeal to the masses is a better idea than doing it if you're ahead? How can you talk about something that you haven't played according to reviews? Watch this: I have never played GTA IV, but I declare it one of the greatest games of all time according to reviews. Do you respect my opinion on the game? |
I didn't say Nintendo was trying to protect sales during the Gamecube era. I said they were probably more willing to take chances on risquier fare back then because they weren't trying to protect sales like they most likely are now when every core game that they have in release is an update in a decades old series, most hardcore series are either conversions of Gamecube games to Wii (or made by Grasshopper Studios), and they love to hype each new party or Wiii series games that they are releasing instead of coming up with an edgier new core ip.
I would say that being ahead and thought of as the family friendly console would probably give them reservations about making a game with lapdancing in it and promoting it heavilly.
Yeah, I thought GTA IV deserved its review scores or at least it didn't deserve nearly as much criticism as it later received. It was an apt social criticism of America at the time while spinning a more serious story than San Andreas. And its European gangsters actually had substance rather than the hip-hop modelled characters of SA.